I love people who stand up for others. They are the kind of people that I want to surround myself with. They do so because they feel it's the right thing to do, they expect nothing back in return, nothing that can benefit them, be it financially or ...

Click here to read this mailing online.

Your email updates, powered by FeedBlitz

Here is a sample subscription for you. Click here to start your FREE subscription

"FIDDAMAN BLOG" - 5 new articles

  1. The Video That Drug Companies Don't Want You To See
  2. British Drug Regulator (MHRA) Dodging the Curve Ball
  3. Paxil, All You Ever Do Is Bring Me Down
  4. GSK: Go Ahead And File A Motion - The Paxil Remix
  5. Prime Minister of the Netherlands Offers Hope To Sierre Parents
  6. More Recent Articles

The Video That Drug Companies Don't Want You To See

I love people who stand up for others. They are the kind of people that I want to surround myself with. They do so because they feel it's the right thing to do, they expect nothing back in return, nothing that can benefit them, be it financially or forms of adulation that they crave.

These are my kind of people.

Last week, in Chicago, MISSD held its annual fundraiser. For those who don't know, MISSD stands for The Medication-Induced Suicide Prevention and Education Foundation in Memory of Stewart Dolin.

Almost 300 people turned up to the event, many of whom who had lost loved ones to akathisia induced suicide.  Others came along to offer support, reporters, activists, former akathisia victims and their friends and family. Lisa Parker from Chicago's NBC 5 was the keynote speaker, and gave a touching talk about her appreciation for MISSD and her connection to MISSD's founder, Wendy Dolin.

At this years annual fundraiser, its fourth, a special video was aired for the first time. It's an educational video, it's short and was made with the layperson in mind - it's a video that pharmaceutical companies and, indeed, medicine regulars do not want you to see because it poses an onslaught of awkward questions for them.

It's a video that deserves to be spread far and wide, and not only by people who are in the same circle as MISSD or I. This needs to go viral and the only way that can happen is by sharing it and leaving comments or 'likes' on it.

If you are reading this now then it will take less than a couple of seconds to share this blog post and/or the video contained within. Don't just share it with people that you know will like it, share it with people who have no idea what akathisia is, share it with family members, with school teachers you may know or any government officials you may know. If you have friends that work in the healthcare profession, share it with them too. If you have people on your Facebook friend list who do nothing but write about their wants and needs all day, then share this video with them. Show them there's more to life than posting photos of their dinner or statuses of the 'woe is me' kind. You, as a human, need to wake these people up. If you use Twitter then do the same. Post to the pharmaceutical companies and regulators - they don't like their ethics being questioned - well, boo-hoo, I don't like having to write about kids they've killed either!

Many people have died as a result of antidepressant induced akathisia, many people still suffer with akathisia - it's a condition that is far more than shaking limbs or an inner restlessness - it is potentially deathly and is caused by psychiatric medications, created by a money driven industry and endorsed by a limp-wristed medicines regulator.

There is a tagline at the very top of my blog, it reads...

"People are being killed because some pharmaceutical or drug regulator executive think life is just about passing 'GO' on a Monopoly board and collecting their salary. The consumers of unsafe drugs are just dealt the 'Chance' cards...face down."

Never has this one single quote of mine been more apt.

The video you are about to see comes as a result of being ignored by the dealers and adjudicators.

So, get sharing and tell others to share too. There are no excuses! Don't leave it to those who have already loved and lost - start contributing now by simply watching and sharing among all of your family and friends. I am.

You see, those involved with MISSD have already lost loved ones to antidepressant induced akathisia. They cannot bring their loved ones back and they all know how hard it is to go through life without husbands, wives and children by their side. The video was put together because these wonderful people don't want the same thing happening to your loved ones.

Video is here - if you want to share the link instead of this blog post then that's fine - share, share and keep on sharing because that's how pharmaceutical companies work - they send out false information and it snowballs into fact. This video is a result of their "fact."

“I said "Somebody should do something about that." Then I realized I am somebody.” ~ Lily Tomlin


For more information on akathisia please visit - http://missd.co/

Bob Fiddaman.


British Drug Regulator (MHRA) Dodging the Curve Ball

throw (sb) a curve (ball)

to surprise someone with something that is difficult or unpleasant to deal with.

Many of you will know by now that the MHRA and I have this love/hate relationship.

The MHRA, for those of you who don't know, are the equivalent of the FDA in the US, Health Canada in, um, Canada, and the TGA in Australia. Their duty is protect the public from unsafe prescription drugs, both licenced ones and ones that are illegally sold, they seem to focus heavily on fake pharmaceutical drugs more than regulate the drugs they have already granted a license to.

So, I've been at loggerheads with the MHRA regarding the whole 'benefit vs risk' ratio that they lay claim to when granting a drug a licence here in the UK.

Many people focus on the risks of these drugs, in fact my own focus used to be on the risks but after stepping out of the bubble and looking in from the outside I saw something that has been staring many of us in the face, yet we've been blind-sided and focused on the risks. We all know what the risks are because these days we are told via the patient information leaflets, albeit in watered down versions.

An old advocate friend of mine, Matthew Holford, was, to my knowledge, the first person to raise the issue regarding the "benefits" of these drugs, namely; SSRI's.

I miss Matt's rantings - he was colorful in the language he used and yet had intelligence that he could use tactically. We still correspond - the guy is a legend.

Anyway, back to the MHRA.

I have asked them a simple question that they have, on numerous occasion, failed to answer. Their latest 'answer' is no different. In fact, it would appear that they are now questioning the English Oxford Dictionary. (I've highlighted in yellow). It would also appear that whoever is answering my emails (they never leave a name) has some form of Avoidant Personality Disorder.

First off, here's the question that they seem to be struggling with...

Please provide me with a "detailed list" that shows the benefits of taking Prozac.
Their previous response to this can be seen here. I questioned that response and they have now replied. Once again, no detailed list of any benefits of Prozac has been sent to me. Once again, they have put "Final response" in the subject line.

Dear Mr Fiddaman

Many thanks for your email concerning our response to your FOI request.

Concerning Question 2, a detailed list of the benefits of taking fluoxetine are presented in the Patient Information Leaflet and the Summary of Product Characteristics for products that contain this active. As we stated in our response, the beneficial effects of the product you specifically mentioned in Question 2 (Fluoxetine 20mg Capsules – PL 17907/0374) have been shown through the clinical data submitted for the grant of the marketing authorisation for Prozac 20mg Capsules (PL 00006/0195). The current list of indications or “benefits” of taking Fluoxetine 20mg Capsules are listed in Section 4.1 of the SmPC, a link to which has been provided below:


Best regards

The FOI Licensing Team.

So, once again, I have had to reply to them. Here's my response.


Dear MHRA,
I'm somewhat confused?
Are you now suggesting that 'indications' and 'benefits' have the same meaning?  I don't really want to enter into a game of semantics, but when I use the word "benefit," in this context, I want to understand how Prozac is going to help me, as the patient, overcome my depression. In other words, what positive thing is going to happen to me, which causes my depression to be alleviated, or else go away altogether?  It is not a clinical benefit to me to know that Prozac may be prescribed for depression - in fact, that information is not a benefit to anybody apart from doctors and drug companies, as far as I can establish.  Do you understand the distinction, between my definition of "benefit," and yours?
I'll cut to the chase, if I may?
I have asked you, the British drug regulator, to provide me a list of benefits, not indications.
Thus far you have sent me links that have not answered my question. In any event, I am asking specifically for a list of benefits from the MHRA and not anyone else.
You licenced a drug and cited that the benefits outweighed the risks. The risks are, as you say, clearly marked in the patient information leaflet that the drug companies provide. I have no interest in what the drug companies say, nor of the risks associated with Prozac. My question was, and still is, to you, the MHRA.
You made the decision to grant Prozac a licence after weighing up the 'benefits and risks', ergo you should be able to provide me with a detailed list of the benefits based upon which you granted Prozac a licence.
Is this going to be a series of emails between us whereby you continue to avoid the question at hand, is this how you treat all stakeholders?
PS - Once again, the subject line from you indicates that this is your 'final response'. Once again, I will decide when my question has been answered adequately, not the other way around.

Bob Fiddaman


I'll let you know when they next send me a reply avoiding the question.

Bob Fiddaman.


Paxil, All You Ever Do Is Bring Me Down

Following on from yesterday's series of motions filed by GSK in the Dolin v GSK Paxil induced suicide trial, today sees five more rib-ticklers from the British pharmaceutical giant.

The motions better known in legal circles as Motions in Limine (“MIL”) - To be honest, they should be known as Motions I Find Funny, MIFF, if you will.

Yesterday saw me re-write the lyrics to a classic Motown tune whereby Smokey Robinson and the Miracles, "I Second That Emotion" became, "Go Ahead and Write That Motion."

In this second part of GSK's laughable motions I will be signing off with another classic, this time from the American band, The Mavericks. More on this later.

Yesterday saw me publish the first 5 motions filed by GSK, motions that are designed to win a case that is, seemingly unwinnable from their point of view.

Here's 5 more.

Defendant GlaxoSmithKline LLC (“GSK”) moves the Court in limine for an order excluding from trial certain improper types of testimony by Plaintiff’s purported experts. 
Although Glaxo name three experts for the plaintiff (Dolin), it appears, after reading through this particular 15 page motion, that David Healy seems to be someone they have a beef with. I've already highlighted Glaxo's apparent beef with Healy here and here. In a nutshell, they do not want Healy to give evidence, their reasoning behind this is straight from the school yard. Boo-hoo.

Another gem...

Defendant GlaxoSmithKline LLC (“GSK”) moves the Court in limine for an order excluding from trial certain opinions and hearsay statements by Plaintiff’s expert, Dr. Joseph Glenmullen.
The reason, GSK claim is that Glenmullen intends to claim, as part of his expert opinion, that " Paxil/paroxetine posed a greater increased risk of suicidality than other SSRIs."

Notice the wording? It's basically an admittance that Pail can cause akathisia in adults which can lead to suicide. GSK just don't want their product to be top of the charts, which is a stark contrast to when their promotional team used sales pitches to prescribing Dr's, describing it as safe and effective, better than Prozac (Paxil's main competitor at the time) - They ere happy to be top of the list back then, yet today they'd much prefer that Paxil played second fiddle to the likes of Prozac, Zoloft, Celexa etc.

Having your cake and eating it springs to mind.

Here's a real classic...

Defendant GlaxoSmithKline LLC (“GSK”) moves the Court in limine for an order  excluding from trial any evidence of, or reference to, other claims, lawsuits, governmental investigations or charges, or media reports regarding Paxil.

So, basically GSK don't want the Judge or jury to see Paxil's history of causing birth defects, suicide, homicide, severe withdrawal problems. Furthermore, they don't want the Judge or jury to know about the illegal marketing they carried out with Paxil, a result of which saw them plead guilty to the US Department of Justice. The guilty plea resulted in a record-breaking $3 billion and documents released from that litigation showed how they had...

  • unlawfully promoted Paxil for treating depression in patients under age 18
  • participated in preparing, publishing and distributing a misleading medical journal article that misreported that a clinical trial of Paxil demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of depression in patients under age 18.
  • did not make available data from two other studies in which Paxil also failed to demonstrate efficacy in treating depression in patients under 18.
  • sponsored dinner programs, lunch programs, spa programs and similar activities to promote the use of Paxil in children and adolescents.

Putting the $3 billion aside, Glaxo also don't think it's fair that the Judge and jury see a previous case regarding Paxil and suicide. Tobin vs SmithKline Beecham saw a jury return a verdict of guilty when they were asked to deliberate one simple question. See fig 1. (Click to enlarge)

Fig 1

This request is akin to a request from a defence team asking that an accused murderer be given a fair trial, ergo no mention of the serial killing spree he went on before the crime he stands accused of today, because, well, because that just wouldn't be fair.


Defendant GlaxoSmithKline LLC (“GSK”) moves the Court in limine for an order excluding from trial any evidence of, or reference to, its 2012 plea agreement, civil settlement agreements, and associated documents.

So, they plead guilty to a whole host of violations, including fraud centered around the promotion of Paxil and yet they don't want the Judge or jury to know this? What planet are they from? Do they really think that jury members won't already know about their abhorrent history, do they honestly believe this? GSK's rap sheet extends far beyond the $3 billion fine handed down to them in 2012. In fact, I put three videos together way before the 2012 guilty plea. You can view them here, here and here.

Defendant GlaxoSmithKline LLC (“GSK”) moves the Court in limine for an order precluding Plaintiff from attempting at trial to contradict, dispute, retract, or modify judicial admissions that she has made before this Court, in filings and otherwise.

Hopefully, what's good for the goose, is good for the gander.

I guess a good question would be can Paxil cause suicide - they will answer yes.

Then hit them with the curve-ball - You have known about the suicide link since the early 1990's and, for many years denied it, what makes you think you are entitled to retract statements yet you have filed a motion requesting that Plaintiff be denied that right?

It's a fair enough question, right?


And now some music.

Sing-a-long now.

Lyrics beneath the video.


Paxil, All You Ever Do Is Bring Me Down

I can't sleep a wink anymore
Side effects from Paxil I can't ignore.
Then I just started pacing to forget
But I don't think the worst has happened yet.

All you ever do is bring me down
Turning my whole world upside down.
They all wonder why I wear a frown
That's cause Paxil, all it does is bring me down

It's funny how my whole world fell apart
Paxil changed my mood right from the start
I tried to tell myself I wasn't blue
Yet all along the company, Glaxo, knew.

[Repeat chorus twice]

The Fidericks 2016
Music by The Mavericks

Bob Fiddaman.

Back Stories

Dolin v GSK


GSK: Go Ahead And File A Motion - The Paxil Remix

So, here we are again, the latest in the on-going defence of GlaxoSmithKline in relation to Paxil inducing the suicide of an adult, the adult, Stewart Dolin, jumped in front of a train after experiencing akathisia caused by Paxil. His wife, Wendy, filed suit and Glaxo have, it appears, been doing their utmost to disrupt the trial by filing motion after motion. Thus far their attempts have fallen on deaf ears by the trial Judge.

As reported on this blog back in September, the trial Judge has since changed. The previous trial Judge, Judge, James B. Zagel, being replaced for reasons unknown.

Zagel had heard, and tossed, previous arguments and motions from GSK and it now appears that they are going to try, once again, to make an effort to get the new Judge to consider their motions. This just gets better and better!

The motions, known as Motions in Limine (“MIL”) have had me in a state of complete apoplexy, so much so that I've decided to rewrite a Motown classic, more on this later.

Let's take a look at some of these MILS.

First off...

To exclude from trial any evidence of, or reference to, alleged conduct by GSK or Paxil® (“Paxil”) labeling that predates 2004.

You see, prior to 2004, GSK never mentioned anything about Paxil causing some people to kill themselves.

GSK are arguing that, "Nonetheless, GSK anticipates that Plaintiff will attempt, if permitted, to try this case as if  Mr. Dolin had committed suicide many years before he did." (Insert laughter here) Maybe GSK's hired attorneys, King & Spalding, should change their name to McFly LLC.

MIL 2...

Defendant GlaxoSmithKline LLC (“GSK”) hereby files this Motion in Limine to  preclude: (1) any evidence or argument alleging that GSK could have changed the language in the Boxed Warning for Paxil® (“Paxil”) concerning suicidality without prior approval from the  United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”); (2) any evidence or argument alleging  that GSK “misled” FDA or violated the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”), 21 U.S.C. §§ 301, et seq., and/or its implementing regulations

So, lets get this straight. GSK don't want a Judge or jury to see evidence that they misled the FDA? Nor do they want the Judge or jury to be witness to any evidence that they (GSK) could have changed the labelling for Paxil without approval from the FDA.

MIL 3...

Defendant GlaxoSmithKline LLC (“GSK”) moves the Court in limine for an order  excluding any argument, testimony, or evidence that GSK had a duty to directly warn patients of  the risks of taking paroxetine.

MIL 4...

Defendant GlaxoSmithKline LLC (“GSK”) hereby files this Motion in Limine to Exclude Any Evidence of or Reference to Its Marketing and Promotion of Paxil®(“Paxil”)

They probably don't want the Judge or jury to see these two internal memos they circulated amongst staff when Paxil was earning them billions in revenue.

Click to enlarge

MIL 5...

Defendant GlaxoSmithKline LLC (“GSK”) moves this Court in limine for an order precluding Plaintiff from introducing certain testimony or evidence relating to the use of Paxil® (“Paxil”) by pediatric patients.

Well, they wouldn't want to answer to evidence about Paxil killing kids now, would they? That would make them out to look bad and we all know tht GSK are squeaky clean when it comes to Paxil studies in children, right? Nor that they hired a ghostwriter to make it look as if Paxil was safe for kids.

Okay, as promised, it's time for a musical interlude. Hopefully you're all still following and haven't yet left the comfort of your computer chair to dry your eyes from the uncontrollable laughter.

Here's the original. (Instrumental)

Sing-a-long with the words below video.


Go Ahead And File A Motion - The Paxil Remix

Maybe to win this trial you'll cheat
But there's no denying your rap sheet.
And maybe you have reasons to stall
Your drug has killed many, after all.

In that case I don't want no part
I do believe that, your lawyers have blackened hearts.
Oh, but if you feel stalling me
If you got the notion
Go ahead, and file a motion.

Oh, but if you feel stalling me
If you got the notion
Go ahead, and file a motion.


Maybe you think that stalling will bring me down
And maybe you think you can run me into the ground.
Maybe you think that I'm just a fool
Knowing all along it was you who broke the rules.

In that case I don't want no part
I do believe that, your lawyers have blackened hearts.
Oh, but if you feel stalling me
If you got the notion
Go ahead, and file a motion.

Oh, but if you feel stalling me
If you got the notion
Go ahead, and file a motion.

Ooh, ooh

Ooh, ooh

Oh GSK, in that case I don't want no part
I do believe that, your lawyers have blackened hearts.
Oh, but if you feel stalling me
If you got the notion
Go ahead, and file a motion.

Oh, but if you feel stalling me
If you got the notion
Go ahead, and file a motion.

Go ahead, and file a motion.
[FADES] - Ooh GSK, go ahead, and file a motion.

Pokey Fiddaman & The Satiricals - 2016
Music by Smokey Robinson & The Miracles

Part II coming soon.

Bob Fiddaman.

Back Stories

Dolin v GSK


Prime Minister of the Netherlands Offers Hope To Sierre Parents

Children from the Sierre coach crash before they left for Switzerland and the ski trip that would end in tragedy.

In a show of common sense and tremendous empathy, the Prime Minister of the Netherlands, Mark Rutte, has given the parents of the Sierre bus crash victims a glimmer of hope in seeking answers as to the medication the bus driver may have been taking or withdrawing from at the time he deliberately crashed a Top Tours bus into a tunnel wall in Sierre back in 2012.

An independent investigation into the crash, carried out by Independent Forensic Services (IFS), showed that the driver, Geert Michiels, made two clear movements seconds before the crash, consciously and with the intention of running the bus into the wall of the tunnel. A previous  autopsy also revealed traces of paroxetine in the system, paroxetine is the generic name of Seroxat, also known as Paxil.

Two photos, taken from a CCTV camera situated in the tunnel show that Michiels mouted a small pavement and deliberately crashed the bus into a wall - at no time did he apply the brakes or make any attempt to steer the bus away from the oncoming wall. (Fig 1 and 2)

Fig 1

Fig 2

A letter sent to Rutte last week from one of the parents, Olga Leclercq, had urged the Dutch PM to intervene with regard to a request made for blood samples of Michiels to be released. The letter stated that the blood samples could be analysed to see if Michiels had a pre-disposition to Seroxat which may have led to the side effects of the drug causing akathisia, which is a known pre-cursor to suicide and acts of violence, including homicide. Basically his DNA will show whether he had a common genetic defect that made him more susceptible to the dangerous side effects of Seroxat.

It's a bold move from the Dutch Prime Minister and one that should be applauded.

Emails to both the British drug regulator, the MHRA, and the European drug regulator, the EMA, have fallen on deaf ears and both have, more or less, washed their hands of the Seroxat link in this crash - their excuse, as one would expect from these limp-wristed outfits, was that Glaxo have a monitring system in place to pick up on suspect adverse drug reactions when mentioned in the media. To date, GlaxoSmithKline, who market and manufacture Seroxat, have made no attempt to contact Douglas de Coninck, the author of the book, 'De busramp in Sierre: 1 Pill, 28 Dead'. The book highlights many facts regarding the state of mind of Michiels and the medication (Seroxat) that he was taking.

Eline - Age 11

One has to praise the tenacity of Olga Leclercq here. She lost her beautiful daughter, Eline (pictured above), in the crash and Olga has since been campaigning to get to the truth. The official investigation was inconclusive, leaving Olga and the parents of 21 other children in limbo.

Here's the letter from Mark Rutte to Olga - (Translated into English)

Dear Mrs, Leclercq, 
Thank you for your Letter dd  1st of Oktober, In which you ask attention for the investigation concerning the bus crash in Sierre. 
The horrible disaster of the 13th of March 2012 is for me, and also for many people in the Netherlands, Belgium and Switzerland, a very black memory.  
The suffering of the parents and other next of kin is of course on a completely different level.  
I understand very clearly, how important it is for them, that everything needs to be done to bring the cause of this crash to light. 
The Ministry of foreign affairs has, in response to your letter, declared to be happy to see how the Swiss authorities can be contacted in order to request them to release a blood sample, in order to make research possible. 
As I understand, you were in touch with Mrs REDACTED and Mrs REDACTED before.
They are also in this case the contacts.
They will contact you directly as soon as they have more information about the possible steps to take.
I realise that I cannot guarantee that these efforts will have the desired results. 
However, I find it of great importance to do everything within the possibilities to find the cause of the crash.
I would like to wish you, and through you all next of kin, a lot of strength. 
Best Regards, -
Mark Rutte

It's evident that Mr. Rutte has something that employees of the MHRA, the EMA and, indeed, GlaxoSmithKline, don't have.


Employees of all three, especially the executives, should today be hanging their heads in shame. Experience, however, tells me that they don't even know the meaning of the word.

It really is high time that this drug was pulled from the shelves given the amount of destruction it has caused since it was first licensed. Suicide, homicide, severe withdrawal, self-harm and birth defects - it's a no-brainer yet regulators much prefer to bury their heads in the sand regarding the safety of Seroxat. It's ignorant and, dare I say it, very cowardly.

It's also incumbent of us all to spread the truth about how antidepressants like Seroxat can cause this condition known as akathisia - it's been kept in the dark for far too long. Men, women and children are dying as a result of its suppression by pharmaceutical companies and global regulators. Plane crashes, bus crashes where the operator of the vehicle suffers akathisia as a result of the medication he/she has been taking ~ Do you, as a parent, really want to send your child off on a school trip not knowing if you'll ever see them again? Ask questions, demand answers - become a pain in the ass - you may just save some lives.

On behalf of truth seekers everywhere I thank Mark Rutte for offering the parents of the Sierre tragedy some hope.

Bob Fiddaman.

Back Stories.

Did Seroxat Trigger the Fatal Sierre 2012 Bus Crash?

Sierre Bus Crash Revisited

For the Sake of the Children ~ Act Now!

Did the Sierre Bus Driver Have a Pre-Disposition to Seroxat?


More Recent Articles

You Might Like

Click here to safely unsubscribe from "FIDDAMAN BLOG."
Click here to view mailing archives, here to change your preferences, or here to subscribePrivacy