Click here to read this mailing online.

Your email updates, powered by FeedBlitz

Here is a sample subscription for you. Click here to start your FREE subscription

"EconWeekly" - 5 new articles

  1. Talking worth hearing: Accounting for profits
  2. Talking worth hearing: China
  3. QE: What if investors don't buy it?
  4. Unemployment rate and employment growth: Reasonable expectations
  5. Talking worth hearing: GDP
  6. More Recent Articles
  7. Search EconWeekly
  8. Prior Mailing Archive

Talking worth hearing: Accounting for profits

Stan Pignal, Patrick Foulis, and Philip Coggan (all three from The Economist), talk about how managers find (mostly) legal ways to puff up corporate earnings.

~12 minutes


Talking worth hearing: China

Tyler Cowen talks about the rise and fall of the Chinese economy: how they grew so fast, and why they're in trouble now.

~12 minutes

I like Tyler's insight that decades of high growth distorted the assessment of the risk/return of new investment projects, which is distinct (but compatible) from a decline in the marginal productivity of capital.


QE: What if investors don't buy it?

John Authers has written another good column. It's about "what happens if rates never rise." Among many interesting things, he reminds us to watch profits (payrolls and GDP are secondary, really). He also walks us through the (increasingly plausible) scenario where the Fed doesn't raise rates at all, and  the central bank needs to resort to QE to counter an economic slowdown.

He writes, in passing, something with disturbing implications:
The risk continues to be that investors at some point give up on monetary policy and its power to make a difference — and that would be bad for stocks. So rather than plan for a continued indiscriminate rally in US stocks, it is probably better to focus on those that can show some sustained pricing power, and on those that pay a decent yield.
That first sentence (emphasis mine) entails a mind-blowing possibility. What it the emperor has no clothes?  What if the main (only?) effect of QE is through higher asset valuations? What if QE works because investors think it works and nothing else? What if investors wake up and decide that QE doesn't work?

Unemployment rate and employment growth: Reasonable expectations

Stephen Williamson wrote a fantastic post, where he bounds reasonable numbers for employment growth and the unemployment rate, in the U.S., in coming months.


-200k jobs added per month, which many observers find normal, is more than we can reasonably expect.

-Recent trends and the current level of labor force participation suggest that employment can't grow faster than 0.5% for too long. 200k jobs per month imply a 1.7% growth rate, given the current level of unemployment.

-The unemployment rate can't probably get much lower than 4.6%.

-Going forward, monthly employment growth should be closer to 60k (population growth) than the "normal" 200k.

Talking worth hearing: GDP

Stan Pignal and Ryan Avent (from The Economist), and Mike Jakeman (from the Economist Intelligence Unit), discuss whether GDP is an appropriate indicator of an economy's health.

~12 minutes

(I wish they wouldn't implicitly endorse the popular definition of recession, i.e. two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth. It's truly an awful notion.)


More Recent Articles

You Might Like

Click here to safely unsubscribe from "EconWeekly."
Click here to view mailing archives, here to change your preferences, or here to subscribePrivacy